The 1619 Project

The first episode of The 1619 Project is insightful, poignant, and revelatory about the state of American democracy. It shows how black Americans have had to fight every step of the way to be included in the democratic process, and that these battles are far from relics of the past. The way that the documentary is structured is similar to Claudia Rankine’s Citizen: An American Lyric because both pieces of media incorporate stories told through a series of anecdotes. The 1619 Project creates a narrative about voter suppression by showing real barriers to entry in the voting process in the same way that Citizen creates a narrative about oppression by sharing individual microaggressions that black people have experienced. Both The 1619 Project and Citizen also utilize powerful imagery intended to enhance the material. One example of this in Citizen is the image of a black sculpture adorned with flowers, contorted and hunched over, which is meant to exemplify the commodification of black bodies for white consumption that was discussed in the text. The 1619 Project often features footage of black Americans while voice overs play, some examples of this being a man wrapped in an American flag and a pregnant woman. This footage was shown after a discussion about black people’s importance in building America and their determination to remain in a country that they helped to create, which was powerful and sent a clear message. Similar to Citizen, the imagery enhances what is being communicated through the words.


One thing that stood out to me in particular in The 1619 Project is the sinister nature of voter suppression and how tactical it is. A prime example of this is when a group of elderly black people were denied their right to vote because of a clerical error and were told they had to go to a polling location 20 minutes away. This is clearly an example of predation on a vulnerable group; the poll workers know that these people have no way of getting to another polling station and at that point, it would be easier for them not to vote at all. Voter suppression is no longer as blatant as the grandfather clauses and literacy tests of the past. Modern voter suppression involves making the process as difficult as possible for marginalized groups in order to discourage them from trying to vote at all. This insidious process makes sure that not everyone’s voice is heard and keeps the status quo in order. It is also why the work that the people in the documentary are doing is so important: something as simple as education and advocation can cause major upsets in the polls and help often unheard voices to speak up.

Myriam Gurba Asks: What Do We Have To Lose By Being Mean?

Myriam Gurba is the author that I connected with the most this semester, not because her book was my favorite that we read (although it is up there), but because I (maybe foolishly) believe that she and I could be friends in real life. This is partially because Gurba made me feel like her friend already with her intimate, stream-of-consciousness writing style; her level of vulnerability in her memoir puts the reader at ease and elicits the same feeling as chatting with someone you have known your entire life. Watching Gurba’s event at SUNY Cortland only affirmed these feelings and made me more fond of her as an author and as a person. The first thing I noticed about Gurba was her humbleness: she referred to her introduction as “generous” and she is clearly not a person who is particularly comfortable with being praised and hearing her accolades listed. One thing she is comfortable with, though, is delving into and unpacking her art with an audience. I have the utmost admiration for Gurba’s vulnerability during this event. She mentions that when she was teaching, she told her students not to read Mean until she was no longer their teacher because it might make being in the classroom together awkward for everyone involved. I can only imagine that the same sense of awkwardness is present when entering a zoom call knowing that everyone there has read about your deepest traumas. Despite this, Gurba not only unpacked Mean for the attendees, but also read a work in progress. There are not many people who would have the courage to not only read unfinished work for an audience, but also to open themselves up to critiques on said unfinished work. The two observations that I have listed about Gurba showed me that she is a perfectionist who cares deeply about her art and is constantly striving to do better, something that I relate to and made me feel even more connected to her. 

It was also invaluable to hear Gurba herself discuss Mean and what it means (ha) to her. One of my favorite insights that she gave was about her artistic interpretation of the traumatic events in the book and her choice to invite the reader to imagine themselves as a part of the environment. Gurba says that her goal was to encapsulate the way that trauma victims often remember these events: as out of body experiences, watching themselves from an outside perspective. This resonated with me greatly, as I have had out of body experiences in that way before, and hearing Gurba discuss her intention helped me to understand and connect with that part of the book on a deeper level. I also found Gurba’s statement that some traumas will always feel raw to be insightful as well as confirming my thoughts about the end of Mean. In class, I said that Mean is too nuanced to have something as neat and simple as a “happy ending;” rather, Gurba provides a realistic look at life after a traumatic event. Some things simply cannot be forgotten or completely healed, but there are ways to cope and still live a fulfilling life. Gurba describes her experience being stalked as “transformative,” acknowledging that she is not the same person after. Sometimes, the way to move on from trauma isn’t to desperately cling to the person you used to be, but to accept the person you have become and work from there. I love that Gurba does not act like she is unaffected by her trauma and instead embraces the ways in which she has changed. She does not pretend that everything is perfect now that some time has passed, but she also never gives up on herself and is determined to push on. Gurba is able to write succinctly about her trauma without being completely consumed by it, a skill that reveals her strength and her talent. 

“He has a battle rifle”

My found poem is titled “He has a battle rifle” and it is taken from a Texas Tribune article with the same name. The article is about the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, and it specifically focuses on the lack of police intervention during the shooting. Reading this article made me angry because it makes it clear that more lives could have been saved if the police had stepped in sooner. I understand how incomprehensibly terrifying that situation must be. I don’t know what I personally would do, but that’s why I’m not a cop and don’t plan on becoming one. It is part of the job of the police to be prepared to lay down their lives to protect the innocent, especially children. An especially frustrating detail is that some of the officers were armed with the same gun as the shooter, an AR-15, and yet still did not feel adequately prepared to diffuse the situation. A common argument against gun control is that restricting firearms would prevent “good guys with guns” from stopping “bad guys with guns.” This situation calls into question the validity of that argument: who cares that the good guy and the bad guy have the same weapon if the good guy is too afraid to use it? 

In this found poem, I attempted to somewhat tell the story of that day while also reflecting on the aftermath. My method was to create a narrative by pulling lines from different sections of the article to create a throughline. I wanted the beginning to feel choppy and disconnected to mimic the confusion and panic that everyone involved felt that day. I also wanted to include the snippet of a conversation between two officers to emphasize how harrowing it was for them to realize that the shooter was carrying an AR-15. I edited sentences in multiple places, most significantly in the section that says “cowardice, or poor leadership, or a lack of sufficient training killed 19 children and two teachers.” The actual article said nothing of the sort, but I made an artistic choice to splice words and make a bold condemnation rather than passively reporting. Intentionally, the largest block of text is at the bottom and reminds us that a year after this tragedy, Texas has still not even considered implementing stricter gun control laws. It feels as if no amount of lost lives will be enough to convince some people, particularly government officials, that change is necessary. However difficult it may be, it is important to continue these conversations and be loud about the need for gun control in America.

The Misogyny of Walter Lee

When discussing oppression in Lorraine Hansberry’s A Raisin in the Sun, the most obvious example is the racism and discrimination that is experienced by the Younger family. However, the play also more covertly tackles the issue of misogyny, specifically through the character of Walter Lee. Walter is an ambitious man with big dreams, but he is also egotistical, chauvinistic, and dismissive of the people (especially the women) around him. Walter fears that his future is “a big, looming blank space—full of nothing” (37), a thought that leaves him feeling trapped and helpless. Walter Lee constantly belittles and asserts his dominance over the women in his life, especially his wife, because it makes him feel more in control and allows him to escape the emasculation of being unable to provide for his family.

The first example of this behavior from Walter takes place when his son, Travis, asks for 50 cents to take to school. After Ruth says that they don’t have any money to give, Walter feels ashamed and offers Travis the 50 cents anyway, even going so far as to throw in extra to prove to Travis that the family has nothing to worry about financially. As Walter hands Travis the money, the stage directions say that he does so “without even looking at his son, still staring hard at his wife” (8). These very intentional directions show that Walter is doing this to assert his dominance over Ruth. He is clearly telling Ruth not to embarrass him in front of his son and that he does not care what Ruth thinks about their money (even though Ruth is the one who handles the finances and actually knows how much money they have). Walter does all of this for show because Ruth emasculated him in front of Travis, which is further proven when he sheepishly has to ask her for money at the end of the scene. 

After Travis leaves, Walter attempts to convince Ruth that his investments are a good idea, naming three different men who agree with him and want to do the same thing. When she says a single word in question of his decisions, he immediately bites back with “see there, that just goes to show you what women understand about the world” (9). This shows that Walter does not value the opinions of the women in his life and would much rather take advice from random men over his own wife. Walter also blames Ruth (and black women in general) for his shortcomings by accusing her/them of being unsupportive. He laments that this is “just what is wrong with the colored woman in this world . . . don’t understand about building their men up and making ’em feel like they somebody. Like they can do something” (10). When Ruth argues that there are successful black men, he responds “no thanks to the colored woman” (10). It is much easier for Walter to blame women for not being encouraging or nurturing enough than it is for him to face his own failures, so he is comfortable making Ruth the scapegoat for what his life has become. This exchange reveals Walter’s negative views towards women in general, not just the ones around him, and his unwillingness to take accountability for his own mistakes.

Later in the scene, Beneatha enters and Walter shows his unique distaste towards her. Beneatha is ambitious and well-educated, traits that Walter does not associate with femininity, and thus he is both intimidated and disgusted by her. They start to argue about Mama’s incoming money and Walter implies several times that Beneatha does not deserve it. Eventually, the argument comes to a head and Walter blurts out “who the hell told you you had to be a doctor? If you so crazy ’bout messing ’round with sick people—then go be a nurse like other women—or just get married and be quiet” (13). This exclamation reveals Walter’s true feelings: he feels more entitled to the money than Beneatha because she is a woman attempting to have a career. Because Walter sees women as inferior, he resents that Beneatha might humiliate him by making something of herself before he does. 

Walter feels that simply because he is a man, he deserves respect and submission from the women in his family, even his own mother. In scene two, Walter comes home ravenous for the newly received check, and he is furious when Mama wants him to instead discuss a serious matter with Ruth. In a rage, he shouts “WILL SOMEBODY PLEASE LISTEN TO ME TODAY!” (35), which indicates that he takes out the stresses of his day on his female family members when he arrives home. Walter does not feel seen or heard in his life outside of the house, so it makes him feel stronger when he forces his wife, mother, and sister to cater to him. Ruth, distraught by her husband, tells Walter he makes her sick to her stomach and leaves. Walter, never one to miss an opportunity to make his wife feel small, calls after her “and you turn mine too, baby!” (36). Walter takes every chance he gets to insult and belittle Ruth in order to keep her subservient to him. 

Walter’s attitude towards women is consistently condescending, rude, and dismissive. He, by his own admission, believes that men are superior to women, and yet he relies intrinsically on the women around him to feed his ego and protect his masculinity. Walter Lee’s character is an excellent example of a misogynist who makes himself feel better and more worthy by putting women down. 

  1. Do you sympathize with Walter because of his unfortunate circumstances, or do you feel that his behavior is irredeemable?
  2. If you were Ruth, considering everything about the position that she is in, would you stay with Walter?

Hansberry, Lorraine. A Raisin in the Sun: A Drama in Three Acts.

Hi! I’m Kara Vito

My name is Kara Vito and I’m currently a junior here at SUNY Cortland! My favorite book that I’ve ever read is A Little Life by Hanya Yanagihara. It’s very long and a little bit difficult to get through, but very worth it for how heartbreakingly beautiful the story is. I’ve only read it once because of how long it is but I honestly would call it life-changing. I’m looking forward to working with all of you this semester!

css.php Skip to content